Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorD. Andersson, Tommy
dc.contributor.authorGetz, Donald
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-21T08:51:54Z
dc.date.available2024-02-21T08:51:54Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttps://thuvienso.hoasen.edu.vn/handle/123456789/14937
dc.descriptionTourism Management 30 (2009) 847–856vi
dc.description.abstractThis paper discusses important policy and management implications of tourism as a mixed industry in which public, not-for-profit, and private organisations such as festivals both compete and collaborate in creating the tourist product. To illustrate, four samples of festivals from the UK, Australia, Norway and Sweden are systematically compared in terms of their ownership, governance, structure, and content. Although the festivals offered a similar product and had similar mandates, they differed considerably in terms of revenue sources, cost structure, use of volunteers, corporate sponsorship, and decision-making. These differences are potentially important to destinations that view festivals as attractions and use them in place marketing. Implications are drawn for festival management and tourism policy, and recommendations are made for extending this line of inquiry to the tourism industry as a whole.vi
dc.language.isoenvi
dc.publisherElserviervi
dc.subjectMixed industry; Ownership; Festivals; Business modelsvi
dc.titleTourism as a mixed industry: Differences between private, public and not-for-profit festivalsvi
dc.typeArticlevi


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record