Hiển thị biểu ghi dạng vắn tắt

dc.contributor.authorKim Hoque
dc.contributor.authorNick Bacon
dc.contributor.authorMuhammad Umar Boodoo
dc.contributor.authorMike Wright
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-18T06:51:15Z
dc.date.available2023-12-18T06:51:15Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://thuvienso.hoasen.edu.vn/handle/123456789/14638
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides the first nationally representative assess ment of intrinsic job quality in leveraged buyouts (LBOs). We propose a workforce re-contracting perspective, which views LBOs as having negative implications for some aspects of intrinsic job quality (job demands) but positive implica tions for others (job resources), and employee wellbeing and affective outcomes that are no different than in comparable non-LBOs. Our empirical findings support this perspective. Nevertheless, we find some evidence that certain LBO types have more negative implications for specific elements of intrinsic job quality than others. However, our overall find ings contribute towards studies suggesting that the impact of LBOs on employees is modest, while also highlighting the varying implications of different LBO types for employees.vi
dc.language.isoenvi
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltdvi
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHuman Resource Management Journal 2023;;33:728–747
dc.subjectfinancialisationvi
dc.subjectjob qualityvi
dc.titleFinancialisation and the management of people: Are leveraged buyouts bad for intrinsic job quality?vi
dc.typeArticlevi


Các tập tin trong tài liệu này

Thumbnail

Tài liệu này xuất hiện trong Bộ sưu tập sau đây

Hiển thị biểu ghi dạng vắn tắt