Trusting groups
| dc.contributor.author | Bennett, Matthew | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-30T04:34:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-12-30T04:34:09Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Katherine Hawley was skeptical about group trust. Her main reason for this skepticism was that the distinction between trust and reliance, central to many theories of interpersonal trust, does not apply to trust in groups. Hawley’s skeptical arguments successfully shift the burden of proof to those who wish to continue with a concept of group trust. Nonetheless, I argue that a commitments account of the trust/reliance distinction can shoulder that burden. According to that commitments account, trust is a distinctive kind of reliance grounded in a positive appraisal of features of the trustee’s practical rationality, foremost their commitments and their capacity to act on those commit ments. This is one way we can make sense of the difference between trusting and relying on individual people. I argue it is also a way we can make sense | vi |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://thuvienso.hoasen.edu.vn/handle/123456789/14753 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | vi |
| dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | vi |
| dc.subject | Trust; reliance; groups | vi |
| dc.title | Trusting groups | vi |
| dc.type | Article | vi |