How is human resource management research  (not) helping practice? In defence of practical  implications

dc.contributor.author	Nadia K. Kougiannou
dc.contributor.author	Maranda Ridgway
dc.date.accessioned	2023-12-18T08:11:21Z
dc.date.available	2023-12-18T08:11:21Z
dc.date.issued	2020
dc.description.abstract	This article provokes that human resource management (HRM) research is a long way from helping practice. Follow ing a review of HRM empirical articles published in 2018, we show the limited focus academic journals place on practical implications. We provoke that HRM journals are failing to ‘do the right thing’ by not requiring authors to pay enough atten tion to communicating the practical implications of their re search. In half of the articles that we reviewed (n = 324) less than 2% of the text focuses on practical implications. We also found that where practical implications were offered, they were often obscure, implicit, and used unintelligible terms. We argue for extensive practical implications to be included in publications that provide an impetus to research relevant topics and close the knowledge-translation gap	vi
dc.identifier.uri	https://thuvienso.hoasen.edu.vn/handle/123456789/14642
dc.language.iso	en	vi
dc.publisher	John Wiley & Sons Ltd	vi
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Human Resource Management Journal 2022;32:470–484.
dc.subject	HR practices	vi
dc.subject	HRM practice	vi
dc.subject	HRM research	vi
dc.title	How is human resource management research (not) helping practice? In defence of practical implications	vi
dc.type	Article	vi

Files

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Name:: How is human resource management research (not) helping practice - In defence of practical implications.pdf
Size:: 176.5 KB
Format:: Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1