Hiển thị biểu ghi dạng vắn tắt
Virtually imagining our biases
dc.contributor.author | Sullivan-Bissett, Ema | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-30T04:20:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-12-30T04:20:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://thuvienso.hoasen.edu.vn/handle/123456789/14751 | |
dc.description.abstract | A number of studies have investigated how immersion in a virtual reality environment can affect participants’ implicit biases. These studies presume associationism about implicit bias. Recently philosophers have argued that associationism is inadequate and have made a case for understanding implicit biases propositionally. However, no propositionalist has considered the empirical work on virtual reality and how to integrate it into their theories. I examine this work against a propositionalist background, in particular, looking at the belief and patchy endorsement models. I argue that the results therein can only be accommodated by a model which recognizes structural heterogeneity, that is, one which allows for implicit biases being both associatively and non-associatively structured. My preferred view – that implicit biases are constituted by unconscious imaginings – allows for this, as well as for heterogeneity at the level of content (propositional and imagistic), a feature which also earn its explanatory keep in this context. I conclude that empirical work on virtual reality and implicit bias gives us a reason to prefer a pluralist model of bias, and that my unconscious imagination model, in its recognizing wide ranging heterogeneity, is uniquely placed to accommodate the results of work on virtual reality and bias mitigation. | vi |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 2023, VOL. 36, NO. 4, 860–893 | vi |
dc.language.iso | en | vi |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | vi |
dc.subject | Implicit bias; associationism; propositionalism; doxasticism; unconscious imagination; virtual reality | vi |
dc.title | Virtually imagining our biases | vi |
dc.type | Article | vi |
Các tập tin trong tài liệu này
Tài liệu này xuất hiện trong Bộ sưu tập sau đây
-
Triết học [60]