Hiển thị biểu ghi dạng vắn tắt

dc.contributor.authorEleni Stavrou
dc.contributor.authorEmma Parry
dc.contributor.authorPaul Gooderham
dc.contributor.authorMichael Morley
dc.contributor.authorMila Lazarova
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-19T00:44:53Z
dc.date.available2023-12-19T00:44:53Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://thuvienso.hoasen.edu.vn/handle/123456789/14648
dc.description.abstractWe examine how institutional context affects the decisions that subsidiaries of multinational corporations (MNCs) make in pursuing particular human resource management (HRM) practices in response to institutional duality. Drawing on Varieties of Capitalism, along with the concept of intermediate conformity, we argue that the use of particular HRM practices by MNC subsidiaries will differ depending on both the combination of home and host institutional contexts, and on the nature of the particular practice under consideration. Using data from a survey of HRM practices in 1196 firms across 10 countries, we compare HRM practices in subsidiaries located and head quartered in different combinations of liberal and/or co ordinated market economies. Our study suggests MNC subsidiaries conform only to the most persuasive norms, while exercising their agency to take advantage of the opportunities presented by institutional duality to adopt practices that distinguish them from indigenous competitorsvi
dc.language.isoenvi
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltdvi
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHuman Resource Management Journal 2023;33:69–94
dc.subjectHRM practicesvi
dc.subjectintermediate conformityvi
dc.titleInstitutional duality and human resource management practice in foreign subsidiaries of multinationalsvi
dc.typeArticlevi


Các tập tin trong tài liệu này

Thumbnail

Tài liệu này xuất hiện trong Bộ sưu tập sau đây

Hiển thị biểu ghi dạng vắn tắt