Hiển thị biểu ghi dạng vắn tắt

dc.contributor.authorNadia K. Kougiannou
dc.contributor.authorMaranda Ridgway
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-18T08:11:21Z
dc.date.available2023-12-18T08:11:21Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://thuvienso.hoasen.edu.vn/handle/123456789/14642
dc.description.abstractThis article provokes that human resource management (HRM) research is a long way from helping practice. Follow ing a review of HRM empirical articles published in 2018, we show the limited focus academic journals place on practical implications. We provoke that HRM journals are failing to ‘do the right thing’ by not requiring authors to pay enough atten tion to communicating the practical implications of their re search. In half of the articles that we reviewed (n = 324) less than 2% of the text focuses on practical implications. We also found that where practical implications were offered, they were often obscure, implicit, and used unintelligible terms. We argue for extensive practical implications to be included in publications that provide an impetus to research relevant topics and close the knowledge-translation gapvi
dc.language.isoenvi
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltdvi
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHuman Resource Management Journal 2022;32:470–484.
dc.subjectHR practicesvi
dc.subjectHRM practicevi
dc.subjectHRM researchvi
dc.titleHow is human resource management research (not) helping practice? In defence of practical implicationsvi
dc.typeArticlevi


Các tập tin trong tài liệu này

Thumbnail

Tài liệu này xuất hiện trong Bộ sưu tập sau đây

Hiển thị biểu ghi dạng vắn tắt